Monday, October 17, 2011
Details of Non-locals residing, conducting business and acquiring land/property in Gilgit-Baltistan
It
is considered that the 1927 State Subject Rule promulgated by the last
Dogra Maharajah Hari Singh in the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir
has been violated, suspended or held in abeyance in Gilgit Baltistan,
particularly since the Bhutto era in the early 1970's. The figures cited
below have a margin of error not more than 10% of each figure quoted.
Thanks to Sahaafi.net and Tanvir sab civil society activist
District wise data (%)
DISTRICT
|
CITY
|
BUSINESS
|
PROPERTIES
| ||
Gilgit
| |||||
Gilgit
|
60.00%
|
35.00%
| |||
Jiglot
|
50.00%
|
20.00%
|
Ghizer
|
Gahkuch
|
70.00%
|
30.00%
| ||
Gupis
|
60.00%
|
50.00%
| |||
Yasin
|
20.00%
|
10.00%
| |||
Chatorkhand
|
20.00%
|
15.00%
|
Diamer
|
Chilas
|
35.00%
|
40.00%
|
Baltistan
|
Skardu
|
20.00%
|
10.00%
|
Ghanche
|
Khapulo
|
15.00%
|
8.00%
|
Hunza-Nagar
|
Aliabad
|
15.00%
|
0.00%
| ||
Sost
|
40.00%
|
5.00%
|
Astore
|
Eidgah
|
20.00%
|
15.00%
|
Major
flour mills, petrol pumps, hotels and transport companies also belong
to non-locals. While 80% of trade with China trade at Sost border (in
Hunza-Nagar), 60% of timber business also belong to non-locals. Needless
to add, the demography of Gilgit-Baltistan is at serious risk, if not
already heavily undermined.
No comments :
Post a Comment